Headlines
  • False or misleading informations are spread by organizations posing as legitimate media outlets in an attempt to twist public opinion in favor of a certain ideology.
  • On social media,watch out for fake messages,pictures,Videos and news.
  • Always Check Independent Fact Checking Sites if You Have Some Doubts About the Authenticity of Any Information or Picture or video.
  • Check Google Images for AuthThe Google Reverse Images search can helps you.
  • It Would Be Better to Ignore Social Media Messages that are forwarded from Unknown or Little-Known Sources.
  • If a fake message asks you to share something, you can quickly recognize it as fake messege.
  • It is a heinous crime and punishable offence to post obscene, morphed images of women on social media networks, sometimes even in pornographic websites, as retaliation.
  • Deepfakes use artificial intelligence (AI)-driven deep learning software to manipulate preexisting photographs, videos, or audio recordings of a person to create new, fake images, videos, and audio recordings.
  • AI technology has the ability to manipulate media and swap out a genuine person's voice and likeness for similar counter parts.
  • Deepfake creators use this fake substance to spread misinformation and other illegal activities.Deepfakes are frequently used on social networking sites to elicit heated responses or defame opponents.
  • One can identify AI created fake videos by identifying abnormal eye movement, Unnatural facial expressions, a lack of feeling, awkward-looking hand,body or posture,unnatural physical movement or form, unnatural coloring, Unreal-looking hair,teeth that don't appear natural, Blurring, inconsistent audio or noise, images that appear unnatural when slowed down, differences between hashtags blockchain-based digital fingerprints, reverse image searches.
  • Look for details,like stange background,orientation of teeth,handsclothing,asymmetrical facial features,use reverse image search tools.

More Details

INDIA: Authorities remain in denial even as Aadhaar-linked hunger deaths continue in Jharkhand

An extract from an  statement issued by the Asian Human Rights Commission

Despite repeated  denial  by the authorities and their attempts to pass on such deaths as deaths by illness, 2 more hunger deaths in Jharkhand have been reported over the last month. This takes the total to 17 since September 2017. The report stated that Kaleshwar Soren (45), a resident of Dumka district and Seeta Devi (75) of Gumla died of hunger. They failed to get their entitled quota of rations from the Public Distribution Scheme because of ‘technical’ reasons on November 11 and October 27 respectively.

Ironically, the authorities claims, that deaths did not occur from hunger, flies in the face of the village head’s admission. He had provided some grains to Soren from the village grain bank established for the very purpose of supporting vulnerable families.

The ‘technical’ reason is the same behind many other hunger deaths. It is the cancellation of ration cards not linked with Aadhaar. It is India’s unique identity numbering being aggressively pushed by the Indian government in the name of weeding out corruption and leakage from welfare schemes. Mr. Soren’s ration card was cancelled in 2016 for the same reason. A study by the Right to Food Campaign, an umbrella organization consisting of many civil society organisations and volunteers, had found the following information. Since September 2017, 14 of the hunger deaths in the state were caused by the same reason- DENIAL of rations despite entitlement because of cancellation of ration cards not seeded with Aadhaar.

Data shows that over 11 lakh ration cards were cancelled in the state after its mandatory linking with ration cards. But then, the problems with the linking are not limited to those who don’t have Aadhaar cards in the first place, for various reasons.

Despite authorities’ claims to the contrary, the problems in linking Aadhaar with the ration cards are manifold. Many of the most needy, like destitute elderly people, are the ones who fail to get the card. They do not have anyone to take them to government centres where the Aadhaar card is distributed. To compound the problem even more, fingerprint verification at the PDS shops-made mandatory in many Indian states including Jharkhand, often fails those engaged in manual labour and the elderly.

Then come the issues in some cases like faulty readings . The point of sale devices show less, and in some cases, no entitlement against real entitlement. Villages in remote areas, again the most needy ones, often face additional electricity and digital connectivity issues. Taken together, these issues make Aadhaar linking exclusionary instead of the stated claims of transparency. Evidence from the ground backs this too.

Six months after Aadhaar linking was made mandatory in Rajasthan, only 44.4 lakh out of over 98 lakh ration beneficiaries, or a mere 45%, could get their rations after being verified by handheld biometrics-reading machines. Similarly, a study by noted economist Jean Dreze found that only 49% of the beneficiaries could get their ration in Ranchi, the capital of Jharkhand after Aadhaar was made mandatory. This being the state of affairs in the state’s capital, one can easily guess the situation in remote areas…..

Sadly, despite repeated denials, the government is not unaware of the deaths caused by Aadhaar failing the genuine needy in the state. The gravity of the problem was severe enough to force Saryu Rai, the state’s minister for Food, Civil Supplies, Public Distribution and Consumer Affairs, to form a committee to look into Hunger Deaths and define them in February this year. He then, ironically, released the report for the state of Ironically, the authorities claims, that deaths did not occur from hunger, flies in the face of the village head’s admission Global Hunger Index 2018 prepared jointly by global NGOs Concern Worldwide (Ireland) and Welthungerhilfe (Germany). It called the state famished. As much as 50.3% of the state did not have enough food while 26% families could afford to eat only twice a day.

Yet, the authorities did nothing other than getting hunger deaths ‘investigated’ by the same people. These are block development officers whose command responsibility would be to ensure that no hunger deaths take place in their jurisdiction. One would not need to apply rocket science here to guess the outcome-DENIAL….

INDIA: Authorities remain in denial even as Aadhaar-linked hunger deaths continue in Jharkhand

 

Related Article

UN: 486 Million Still Hungry in…

In Bangkok, more than a third of children were not receiving an adequate diet as of 2017, the report ...
November 4, 2018

Other Article

Video Report

The Lessons of War:Survival Classes Introduced…

In order to educate students lifetime lessons on survival and patriotism, Ukrainian schools have int ...
November 2, 2024
Video Report

Cybercrime in Nigeria:Inside a “hustle kingdom”

In West Africa, particularly in Ghana and Nigeria, there is a rise in informal academies known as "h ...
November 1, 2024
Video Report

Weather Damage and Arson Attacks Are…

Election officials in the Pacific Northwest states of Washington and Oregon, where ballot box arson ...
Pick of the Day

UN Security Council Meets on Threats…

Adedeji Ebo, Director and Deputy to the High Representative of the United Nations Office for Disarma ...
October 31, 2024
Video Report

US Political History:Some of the Most…

The turn up to the 2024 United States presidential election has been full of twists and turns,but be ...
Pick of the Day

UN Security Council Hears Report on…

Marko Đurić, Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Serbia, addresses the United Nations ...
October 30, 2024

[wp-rss-aggregator feeds="crime-more-world"]
Top