Headlines
  • False or misleading informations are spread by organizations posing as legitimate media outlets in an attempt to twist public opinion in favor of a certain ideology.
  • On social media,watch out for fake messages,pictures,Videos and news.
  • Always Check Independent Fact Checking Sites if You Have Some Doubts About the Authenticity of Any Information or Picture or video.
  • Check Google Images for AuthThe Google Reverse Images search can helps you.
  • It Would Be Better to Ignore Social Media Messages that are forwarded from Unknown or Little-Known Sources.
  • If a fake message asks you to share something, you can quickly recognize it as fake messege.
  • It is a heinous crime and punishable offence to post obscene, morphed images of women on social media networks, sometimes even in pornographic websites, as retaliation.
  • Deepfakes use artificial intelligence (AI)-driven deep learning software to manipulate preexisting photographs, videos, or audio recordings of a person to create new, fake images, videos, and audio recordings.
  • AI technology has the ability to manipulate media and swap out a genuine person's voice and likeness for similar counter parts.
  • Deepfake creators use this fake substance to spread misinformation and other illegal activities.Deepfakes are frequently used on social networking sites to elicit heated responses or defame opponents.
  • One can identify AI created fake videos by identifying abnormal eye movement, Unnatural facial expressions, a lack of feeling, awkward-looking hand,body or posture,unnatural physical movement or form, unnatural coloring, Unreal-looking hair,teeth that don't appear natural, Blurring, inconsistent audio or noise, images that appear unnatural when slowed down, differences between hashtags blockchain-based digital fingerprints, reverse image searches.
  • Look for details,like stange background,orientation of teeth,handsclothing,asymmetrical facial features,use reverse image search tools.

More Details

“If the Chinese Press Were Free, the Coronavirus Might Not Have Become a Pandemic,” Denounces RSF

Reporters Without Borders (RSF) shows that without the authorities’ control and censorship, the Chinese media would have informed the public much earlier of the severity of the coronavirus epidemic, saving thousands of lives and possibly avoiding the pandemic.

In an analysis published on March 13, researchers from the University of Southampton suggest that the number of coronavirus cases in China could have been reduced by 86% if the measures to combat the epidemic, taken in China from 20 January, had been anticipated by two weeks. In view of the chronology of the first days of the crisis, Reporters Without Borders (RSF) shows that, without the control and censorship imposed by the authorities, the Chinese media would have informed the public much earlier of the seriousness of the epidemic, saving thousands of lives and possibly avoiding the pandemic.

October 18: Chinese press reportedly relayed the freezing results of a pandemic simulation

The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, conducted a simulated coronavirus pandemic on October 18, 2019 and alerted the international community to its freezing result: 65 million deaths in 18 months. 

If the Chinese internet were not isolated by an elaborate system of electronic censorship and if the media were not forced to follow the instructions of the Communist Party, the public and the authorities would no doubt have been interested in this information from the States United and which echoes the SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) epidemic, which had caused more than 800 deaths and affected 8000 people mainly in China in 2003.

December 20: Wuhan City Authorities Reported to Journalists

On December 20 , one month after the first documented case, the city of Wuhan already had 60 patients with an unknown SARS-like pneumonia, several of whom frequented the Huanan fish market. Despite the situation, the authorities do not see fit to communicate this information to the media.

If the authorities had not hidden from the media the existence of an epidemic linked to a very popular market, the public would have stopped visiting the place before its official closure, on January 1. 

December 25: Doctor Lu Xiaohong could have expressed her fears to the press 

Doctor Lu Xiaohong, director of the department of gastroenterology of the hospital number 5 of the city of Wuhan, hears of cases of infection affecting the medical personnel from December 25 and suspects from the first week of January that the infection is that the infection is transmissible from human to human.

If journalists’ sources in China did not risk severe penalties ranging from professional reprimand to heavy prison terms, Dr. Lu Xiaohong would have taken responsibility for alerting the media, forcing authorities to act for three weeks sooner than they did.

December 30: the call of the whistleblowers doctors was reportedly picked up by the media

Wuhan Central Hospital emergency department director Ai Fen and a group of doctors launched the alert online on December 30. Eight of them, including Doctor Li Wenliang , who died after the illness, will be arrested by the police on January 3 for having circulated “false rumors” .

If, from that date, the press and social networks had been able to freely take up the information transmitted by whistleblowers, the public would have realized the danger and put pressure on the authorities to take measures limiting the virus spread. 

December 31: social networks would have relayed the official alert in China

China officially alerts the World Health Organization (WHO) on December 31, but at the same time forces the WeChat chat platform to censor a large number of keywords referring to the epidemic.

Without censorship, the social network WeChat, which has a billion active users in China, could have allowed journalists to broadcast reports and prophylaxis advice contribputing to better compliance with the rules recommended by the health authorities.

January 5: the scientific press would have released the coronavirus genome earlier 

Professor Zhang Yongzhen’s team at the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center manages to sequence the virus as early as January 5 , but authorities seem reluctant to publish the genome sequence. On January 11, the day China confirms its first death due to the virus, the researchers leak information on open source platforms, which will cause the laboratory to be closed in retaliation. 

If the Chinese authorities had played the transparency card, they would have immediately communicated the sequence of the coronavirus genome to the scientific press, allowing the international community to save precious time in its research for the development of a vaccine.  

January 13: the international community would have anticipated the risk of a pandemic

The first case of coronavirus infection outside of China is listed in Thailand on January 13 on a Chinese tourist from Wuhan. 

If, at that date, the international media had had full access to information held by the Chinese authorities on the scale of the epidemic, it is likely that the international community would have taken stock of the crisis and better anticipated the risk. a spread of the epidemic outside of China, possibly preventing its transformation into a pandemic.

China ranks 177th out of 180 in the  2019 RSF World Press Freedom Index .

Copyright ©2016, Reporters Without Borders. Used with the permission of Reporters Without Borders(RSF), CS 90247 75083 Paris Cedex 02 https://rsf.org

RSS Error: WP HTTP Error: A valid URL was not provided.

Subscribe Our You Tube Channel

Fighting Fake News

Fighting Lies






Related Article

Since Hasina’s Outster,Media in Bangladesh Facing…

Bangladesh is experiencing much-needed freedom of expression since Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina was ...
October 24, 2024

Media Groups Demand Netanyahu be Held…

During his visit to Washington this week to address members of Congress and attend talks at the Whit ...
July 27, 2024

Investigative Journalist in Peru Weathers Physical…

A Peruvian investigative media outlet uncovered high-level corruption in the government. Threats and ...
July 18, 2024

Fears of Authoritarianism Raised When Pakistan…

Critics say Pakistan is turning into an increasingly authoritarian state. A military Spy agency was ...
July 12, 2024

Myanmar’s Media Navigates Risks to Get…

After three years of military rule in Myanmar, the country's journalists are rebuilding their newsro ...
February 14, 2024

VOA Headquarters Honored as Historic Site…

A plaque honoring Voice of America's headquarters in Washington as a historic site in journalism was ...
February 3, 2024

Other Article

Video Report

The Lessons of War:Survival Classes Introduced…

In order to educate students lifetime lessons on survival and patriotism, Ukrainian schools have int ...
November 2, 2024
Video Report

Cybercrime in Nigeria:Inside a “hustle kingdom”

In West Africa, particularly in Ghana and Nigeria, there is a rise in informal academies known as "h ...
November 1, 2024
Video Report

Weather Damage and Arson Attacks Are…

Election officials in the Pacific Northwest states of Washington and Oregon, where ballot box arson ...
Pick of the Day

UN Security Council Meets on Threats…

Adedeji Ebo, Director and Deputy to the High Representative of the United Nations Office for Disarma ...
October 31, 2024
Video Report

US Political History:Some of the Most…

The turn up to the 2024 United States presidential election has been full of twists and turns,but be ...
Pick of the Day

UN Security Council Hears Report on…

Marko Đurić, Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Serbia, addresses the United Nations ...
October 30, 2024

[wp-rss-aggregator feeds="crime-more-world"]
Top